<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Requisite Reading &#187; Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/category/theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Because the killer app is us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>What Is Real Executive Work? (That Executives Aren&#8217;t Doing)</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2012/01/31/what-is-real-executive-work-that-executives-arent-doing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2012/01/31/what-is-real-executive-work-that-executives-arent-doing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elliott jaques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requisite organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfred Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese workers call their executives &#8220;tea drinkers&#8221; I got some strong comments regarding my post that executives are boobs. I probably should have said &#8220;worthless drags on shareholder value who ought to be golden parachuted into a live volcano that resembles the eternal hell they deserve for being lazy good-for-nothings.&#8221; But let&#8217;s not quibble. Let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2012/01/31/what-is-real-executive-work-that-executives-arent-doing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Role (Social Role) Defines Your Behaviour: Wilfred Brown &amp; Elliott Jaques</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/09/07/job-role-social-role-defines-your-behaviour-wilfred-brown-elliott-jaques/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/09/07/job-role-social-role-defines-your-behaviour-wilfred-brown-elliott-jaques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elliott jaques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erving Goffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Management Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Metal Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requisite organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfred Brown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/09/07/job-role-social-role-defines-your-behaviour-wilfred-brown-elliott-jaques/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lord Wilfred Brown, the Managing Director of Glacier Metal Company, was insistent: Behaviour is as much defined and limited by the role that a work inhabits as his personality and the quality of his relationships within the company. You can even take this farther than he did: the social role you inhabit (or are forced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/09/07/job-role-social-role-defines-your-behaviour-wilfred-brown-elliott-jaques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trust Is Necessary To Society. The Glacier Model Builds Trust</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/08/30/trust-is-necessary-to-society-the-glacier-model-builds-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/08/30/trust-is-necessary-to-society-the-glacier-model-builds-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elliott jaques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Fukuyama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Metal Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requisite organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfred Brown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a fascinating paper at the IMF by social capital guru Francis Fukuyama (Social Capital and Civil Society &#8211; Prepared for delivery at the IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms) that covers his reasoning behind social capital being called &#8220;capital&#8221; at all. Besides being interested in how to create societies, I&#8217;ve always found him a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/08/30/trust-is-necessary-to-society-the-glacier-model-builds-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not All Organizations Should Be Appreciated</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/07/24/not-all-organizations-should-be-appreciated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/07/24/not-all-organizations-should-be-appreciated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appreciative Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naga Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organizational design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=1290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, I was talking with Naga Kumar, who had been a colleague of David Cooperrider at Case Western when he was developing Appreciative Inquiry. He told me that while he like and used a lot of AI in his work, he parted ways with Cooperrider, who believed that AI was value neutral: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/07/24/not-all-organizations-should-be-appreciated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Decision Making Approaches: IMAGINIST / INTUITIONIST</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/01/20/7-decision-making-approaches-imaginist-intuitionist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/01/20/7-decision-making-approaches-imaginist-intuitionist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Decision-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Kinston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deciding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaginist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuitionist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Algie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levels of work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=1193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[I continue my notes on Kinston &#038; Algie's decision systems.] As we continue with our exploration of the seven approaches to decision making that were originally developed by Jimmy Algie, reformulated by he and Warren Kinston, then extended by Warren [refs follow below], keep in mind that they can also be seen in two other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2010/01/20/7-decision-making-approaches-imaginist-intuitionist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Timespans to Solve Communication Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/10/24/using-timespans-to-solve-communication-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/10/24/using-timespans-to-solve-communication-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers/IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timespan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work levels]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder if timespans has any practical usefulness? Here is how I used timespans to clear up a communication problem in a global IT architecture group for an international bank. Awhile back I worked with a group of IT architects at an international bank. The group, although &#8220;headquartered&#8221; in the US, had members in each [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/10/24/using-timespans-to-solve-communication-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Fallow&#039;s Values at Each Level of Work</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/06/jack-fallows-values-at-each-level-of-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/06/jack-fallows-values-at-each-level-of-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Fallow had an excellent article in the recent GO Society book, Organization Design, Levels of Work and Human Capability: Executive Guide (&#8220;On Being Heard: Insights from complexity theory and values as touchstones for effective executive communication across the levels&#8221;). In it, Jack talks about the values that followers seem to expect from a leader [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/06/jack-fallows-values-at-each-level-of-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IQ and Success: What&#039;s the Real Interaction?</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/03/iq-and-success-whats-the-real-interaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/03/iq-and-success-whats-the-real-interaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcolm Gladwell reports that &#8220;the correlation between I.Q. and occupational success is between 0.2 and 0.3.&#8221; That&#8217;s more than no correlation at all but much less than something worth paying much attention to. But it seems somewhat counterintuitive. Elliott Jaques has an answer. I&#8217;m betting that one&#8217;s current capacity of work (your level or work [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/02/03/iq-and-success-whats-the-real-interaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Rewarding Competitiveness Is Stupid If You Want To Make Money (Repost)</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/22/why-rewarding-competitiveness-is-stupid-if-you-want-to-make-money-repost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/22/why-rewarding-competitiveness-is-stupid-if-you-want-to-make-money-repost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews - Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Scott Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kesten Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myth of Market Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a repost from 2006 that didn&#8217;t make it over. It describes a set of studies that so disturb the basic religion of MBA that it required replication across the world to get published. With minor revisions. American business rewards competitiveness. That may seem like a know-nothing statement. Markets reward people with the best product. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/22/why-rewarding-competitiveness-is-stupid-if-you-want-to-make-money-repost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Morgan on using RO in a Megachurch Model</title>
		<link>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/21/john-morgan-on-using-ro-in-a-megachurch-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/21/john-morgan-on-using-ro-in-a-megachurch-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews - Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rev. Dr. John Morgan is the head pastor of a growing independent Evangelical church in New Mexico that uses the mega-church model. Morgan wrote a chapter in the GO Society book (disclosure: I edited that piece) that does a good job describing his efforts and how Work Levels play out in independent churches. In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manasclerk.com/blog/2009/01/21/john-morgan-on-using-ro-in-a-megachurch-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

