Although that certainly didn’t read clearly in the original post.
The guy who wrote the article on Brause’s work didn’t understand RO. That was my point. It was obvious reading the piece that he thought of RO as fascist. IMHO. He has some type of axe to grind. I can make some speculations about what happened but I won’t.
I definitely did not mean to say that Ms Brause misunderstands RO: that would be ludicrous! I send people to that summary beause, even though I would want to see additional research done, it so clearly describes the ideas of CIP. Very handy when I’ve reached the end of my descriptions in my RO evangelism. Which has gone relatively well, I should say, although I don’t think that the Jaques estate has made a ton off of royalties yet but there have been library borrowings.
I publically apologize to Ms Brause for the misunderstanding. My intent was to rant about the the Boston article which I thought did a disservice to both her work and to RO theory in general.
Boy is this embarrassing!
And I added a comment to today’s earlier post that should make my thoughts either more clear or simply reveal how muddled they really are.
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming….